cOAlition S on Journal-Independent Peer Review

I missed this important statement from cOAlition S back in June: Scientific publishing is evolving rapidly. A number of initiatives have moved away from the notion that peer-reviewed articles must be published in traditional Open Access journals or platforms. They...

‘Three false starts on the road to open social science’

Patrick Dunleavy, writing for the LSE Impact blog: Other US-based promoters of open science, like the Centre for Open Science, also cover mainly the quantitative disciplines in social sciences (like psychology and health studies). Yet COS’s somewhat disturbing...

‘A Major Paradox in the Dissemination of Science’

Marcio Rodrigues and his Brazilian colleagues, in a recent commentary, noting that funded researchers in Brazil have roughly $2,000 a year to conduct their studies: A median cost of APCs equal to USD 2,600 was recently estimated. However, APCs can cost more than USD...

‘Library funding for open access at KU Leuven’

KU Leuven's Demmy Verbeke and Laura Mesotten, writing in UKSG Insights on their APC-free Fund for Fair Open Access: We should consider why we strive for OA. If it is only to arrange broader access to the published record, then the easiest approach undoubtedly is to...

The Big APC Question Mark Hovering Over the OSTP Announcement

From yesterday's blockbuster White House announcement on immediate OA for federally funded research: Improving public access policies across the U.S. government to promote the rapid sharing of federally funded research data with appropriate protections and...

Turning the Tables on Mirror Journals

Audrey Smith and co-authors, in a study published in MIT's Quantitative Science Studies late last year, with still more evidence that APCs exclude authors from the Global South: We found that for the overwhelming majority of articles published in the Mirror-Parent...

The APC Dam Is Breaking

The article processing charge (APC)—and its stealthy cousin, the read-and-publish deal—are finally coming under the ferocious assault that they deserve. This last year, both the UNESCO Open Science Recommendation and the Budapest Open Access Initiative came out strong...

The BPC Penalty

COPIM's Judith Fathallah, in an excellent Liber Quarterly overview of funding models for OA monographs: Book Processing Charges [BPCs] may have their place in the publishing landscape, and no doubt will be used across a range of models for the foreseeable future. But...

‘The Case for PubPub’

I wrote a [short piece](https://elephantinthelab.org/the-case-for-pubpub/) for Elephant in the Lab on the virtues of [PubPub](https://www.pubpub.org): > In its early days, PubPub was proudly sui generis. The team ignored most scholarly publishing conventions by...

Concerns about Self-Archiving in the Open Humanities

An interesting, rarely surfaced point, in a [reflection post](https://unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/) from the University of Cambridge's working group on open research in the humanities, on the drawbacks of the "green," accepted-manuscript repository route to...

Must-Read Paper on Shady OPM Deals

From June: A jaw-dropping paper, based on FOIA documents, that tracks the foundation-boring grip that for-profit Online Program Management (OPM) firms like 2U have on public universities. The authors combed through hundreds of private contracts, documenting widespread...

Preprints as a Language-Editing Funnel

Preprint platform Research Square exists to drive business to English-language editing factory American Journal Experts (AJE), which launched the platform in 2018. Preprint authors receive a Language Quality Score, and are then shilled to spend hundreds of dollars on...

‘PubPub’s Plan to Support Self-Hosting’

Speaking of the Knowledge Futures Group's Gabe Stein, here's the key excerpt from his recent post outlining the KFG's plans for PubPub self-hosting: We’re planning to support both centralized and self-hosted versions within our existing nonprofit by slowly building...

‘Social Cost’

The Knowledge Futures Group's Gabe Stein, in a sharp analysis of the peculiar market dynamics of scholarly publishing: Because of this complexity, the academic publishing market imposes enormous social switching costs on its customers. For an individual researcher to...

‘We need a clean break from commercial publishers’

Stanford's Robert Kaplan, arguing in [*Times Higher Education*](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/lets-end-rocky-marriage-between-academia-and-commercial-publishers) for bringing academic publishing in-house [paywalled, alas], cites the author-excluding APC: >...

The Collections Silo

Iowa State's Curtis Brandy, in an [interview](https://ceup.openingthefuture.net/news/52/) on the [Opening the Future](https://www.openingthefuture.net) site: > Libraries have traditionally placed their scholarly communications and collections work in distinct...

‘CC BY: A (Somewhat) Cautionary Licensing Tale’

I missed this [Ubiquity Press post from last April](https://blog.ubiquitypress.com/cc-by-a-somewcautionary-licensing-tale-127e407b3da5): > Until 2021, Ubiquity Press published all of our books under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) […] However, at the...

‘The Peer-Review Crisis’

Colleen Flaherty, writing for Inside Higher Ed: Roland Hatzenpichler, assistant professor of environmental microbiology at Montana State University, said it’s been about a year since he started refusing to review for for-profit journals for free. In response to one...