From the Medium post announcing that scite has struck a deal with Wiley to embed its contextual citation snippets (dubbed, inevitably, Smart Citations) into over a hundred Wiley journals:

Smart Citations display the context of each citation to a publication, allowing readers to see not only how many times a publication has been cited but also how it was cited. Additionally, scite has deployed a state-of-the-art deep learning model to classify the citation statement as providing supporting or disputing evidence for the cited claim.

I've been following scite since its 2019 launch: It's a small, for-profit Brooklyn-based startup that launched with a $350k investment from NY-based ff Venture Capital. The firm, curiously, has won most of its subsequent funding from federal grants, including a $1.5 million award in May 2020 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

The company, in effect, is trying to monetize Henry Small's 30-year-old notion of citation context analysis (elaborated in a 1982 out-of-print book chapter).1 Scite extracts the text around a citation and then—using a machine-learning model—makes a guess on valence: Is the cite "supporting," "disputing," or a mere "mention"?

Interesting. Too bad it's a for-profit, and landing deals that, possibly, will rationalize (in both senses) strategic submission behavior and prop up the journal prestige economy.


  1. Small, H. G. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences
    (pp. 287–310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. ↩