Alberto Pepe, Matteo Cantiello, and Josh Nicholson, in [their arXiv paper calling on arXiv to overhaul itself](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1709.07020%0A):

> **Disclaimer:** This article has originally been written and posted on Authorea, a collaborative online platform for technical and data-driven documents. Authorea is being developed to respond to some of the concerns with current methodology raised in this very piece, and as such is suggested as a possible future alternative to existing preprint servers.

The [paper](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1709.07020%0A) doesn't mention that Authorea is [owned by Atypon](https://www.authorea.com/users/3/articles/319005-authorea-is-acquired-by-atypon-and-joins-the-wiley-family), which itself is a [subsidiary](https://www.atypon.com/news/wiley-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-atypon/) of publishing oligopolist Wiley. All three authors are affiliated with the Wiley-owned platform.

Which begs the question: will the arXiv of the future be nonprofit?

**Update:** The [paper](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1709.07020%0A) was [originally published in 2017](https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07020), before Authorea was acquired by Wiley. A webpage version was posted to arXiv’s experimental [html5 renderer](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/) with a 2022 time stamp, which confused me and many others across Twitter about its pub date.