Demmy Verbeke and Laura Mesotten, [writing in *UKSG Insights*](https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.565/%0A) on the [KU Leuven Fund for Fair OA](https://www.kuleuven.be/open-science/what-is-open-science/scholarly-publishing-and-open-access/open-access-kuleuven/ku-leuven-fund-for-fair-open-access):

> The current push for OA risks putting so much strain on library budgets that there is no money left to foster alternative approaches to scholarly communication beyond the for-profit solutions offered by a handful of big technology companies. This should not deter research libraries from investing in OA, but rather incentivize them to prioritize non-profit, community-led approaches which are better aligned with scholarly values. One possible way to do this is to create a discrete fund specifically focused on financing these alternatives, which has a number of advantages concerning visibility, speed of decision-taking, administration and budget control. The Fund for Fair OA managed by KU Leuven Libraries is an example of such a fund, solely spent on OA books published by a university press and other non-profit initiatives in the field of open scholarship (particularly when funded through library membership programmes).

More like this, please.

The [article](https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.565/%0A) describes KU Leuven's thinking behind the [Fund](https://www.kuleuven.be/open-science/what-is-open-science/scholarly-publishing-and-open-access/open-access-kuleuven/ku-leuven-fund-for-fair-open-access)'s decision to drop APC support, even for nonprofit publications. The issues were mainly logistical: It was a messy hassle. The upshot, though, is that the [Fund](https://www.kuleuven.be/open-science/what-is-open-science/scholarly-publishing-and-open-access/open-access-kuleuven/ku-leuven-fund-for-fair-open-access), since 2021, has turned off what was already a slow-flowing APC spigot.